Select Page
After listing the series of forts Version A of the Burghal Hidage includes a note describing how:

“For the maintenance and defence of an acre’s breadth of wall sixteen hides are required. If every hide is represented by one man, then every pole [an Anglo-Saxon system of measurement equating to c.5.03m] of wall can be manned by four men. Then for the maintenance of twenty poles of wall eighty hides are required”

Correlation between expected size and actual size in measured burhs
(click on the image to enlarge)

It can be seen that there is a close correlation between the expected size of the burh (taken from the formula given in the Burghal Hidage) and the actual size in cases where it has been possible to locate and measure the extent of the burghal defences.

There are two exceptions to this: Exeter and Chichester. Both of these are re-used Roman towns and it is likely that only part of the area of the town was used to create the burh.

Number Name of the Burh Assessment in Hides Equivalent in Feet
1 Eorpeburnan 324 1336
2 Hastings 500 2062
3 Lewes 1300 5362
4 Burpham 720 2972
5 Chichester 1500 6187
6 Portchester 500 2062
7 Southampton 150 619
8 Winchester 2400 9900
9 Wilton 1400 5775
10 Chisbury 700 2887
11 Shaftesbury 700 2887
12 Christchurch 470 1939
13 Wareham 1600 6600
14 Bridport 760 3135
15 Exeter 734 3028
16 Halwell 300 1237
17 Lydford 140 577
18 Pilton 360 1485
19 Watchet 513 2116
20 Axbridge 400 1650
21 Lyng 100 412
22 Langport 600 2475
23 Bath 1000 4125
24 Malmesbury 1200 4950
25 Cricklade 1500 6187
26 Oxford 1400 5775
27 Wallingford 2400 9900
29 Sashes 1000 4125
30 Eashing 600 2475
31 Southwark 1800 7425

Total hides for Wessex = 27070 (actually 27071)

WorcesterWarwick
Number Name of the Burh Assessment in Hides Equivalent in Feet
28 Buckingham 1600 6600
32 1200 4950
33 2400 9900

Total hides for Mercia = 5200

Menu